Vegetarianism
© Sabari Ganesh; “All Rights Reserved”
authorsabariganesh@gmail.com
authorsabariganesh@gmail.com
https://sarahah.top/u/authorsabariganesh
It is a well observed, documented
and accepted fact that psychologically every human being is unique in this
world. However, Sanathana Dharma has verily classified human beings into three psychological
categories - Sathvam, Rajas and Thamas. Every person is a combination of these and
is defined by the dominating. However, the prime objective of human birth being
self-realisation; the three psychological states need to be transcended.
Transcending all the three is the ultimate - Gunaatheetham.
Of the three psychological states of
mind; Thamas is a state when the mind is idle, dormant and non-reactive. Rajas
is a state of mind that is unstable, effervescent and tensed. Sathvam is the
best of the three, when the mind is stable, alert, calm and active. Sathvam is
the balanced state of mind that is between the two opposites - the dull mind
full of inertia called Thamas; and the unstable, effervescent, rattling Rajas. Sathvam
is the only psychological state of mind which upon maturity attains the
ultimate - Gunaatheetham.
Every activity of man reflects
either of the three states; be it food, worship, duty or love. A successful
person is one who has attained the balanced state of mind called Sathvam. It is
implied that, though by birth one may possess any state of psychological
maturity; and the traditional customs as defined by the Veda bearing on any of
the three psychological states; every effort must be focused on achieving the
balanced state of mind - the stable, alert, calm and active mind termed, Sathvam.
Veda describes the presence of
umpteen number of worlds; of which, it defines Earth as 'Karma Bhoomi'. When
the other worlds are mere centres of exhausting the accumulated merits or
demerits; the Earth alone is one such place wherein one can perform and attain
the best or worst of the umpteen number of worlds; or even get liberated. It indicates
the presence of activities belonging to either of the three psychological states.
However, with the passage of time, when a person gets relieved of one's direct
responsibilities, should attain the balanced state of mind, called Sathvam.
Veda has also categorised people
based on functions as Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vysya and Sudra. The categorisation
of people were based on their psychological maturity and functions performed; not
birth. Ancient traditional practice aimed at a society that is distinct in
functions but united in vision; similar to the senses of the body – distinct in
functions but united as one body. Hence the people belonging to every category
were dependent on the other aiming at mutual betterment.
Food provides the essential energy for
any activity of a person in this world. The kind of food consumed determines
the psychological state of a person. Veda which has categorised people based on
activities has also stipulated the distinct kind of food required to promote
the requisite psychological substratum. Bhaagasastra is a part of the Veda
detailing the kind of food permissible to every category of people in a society
that assist their moral activities aiming at the betterment of the society as a
whole.
For instance, the moral
responsibility of a Brahmin is to learn, recite and teach the Veda. Every
activity of man is streamlined by the Veda. The moral duty of a Brahmin is to
guide the society as a whole. The innate necessity for extreme patience has
stipulated this category of people to remain in the Sathvik state of
psychological maturity at all times. For this reason strict vegetarianism and
non-spicy food is mandatory since birth for a Brahmin. Also, a life devoid of materialistic
luxury so as to remain detached and selfless is stipulated.
In the case of a Kshatriya, the
moral responsibility is to fight and protect the geographical territorial
limits of the region. If being a King, to prune the misdeeds of the citizens in
an effort to protect the innocent as guided by the Dharmasastras. These
activities demand the genuine need for the psychologically effervescent and
physically dominant, Rajasik state of mind. Hence spicy food and non-vegetarian
diet is permitted by the Veda for those belonging to this category. However,
their activities too are streamlined by the guidance of the Dharmasastras,
discoursed by the Sathvik Brahmins.
The prime responsibility of a Vysya
is to roam around the entire earth in pursuit of wealth and material
prosperity. The objective of such a pursuit is the economic betterment of the
society that one belongs to as a whole; thereby benefitting its every member. Strict
vegetarianism is not stipulated obligatory by the Veda, due to the inherent practical
dilemma; with consideration. Nevertheless, this relaxation is understood to be
applicable only in times of critical compulsion and situational predicament.
In the case of people performing
strenuous physical activities like agriculture or construction of dams and
temples, the need for Thamasik state of mind is justified. Scientifically, the
more strenuous and repetitive the work is physically, the more latent the mind
becomes. A food regime that is much relaxed when compared to that of the
Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vysyas in terms of quality and quantity is permitted
by the Veda for this category of people.
Strict vegetarianism is assigned by
the Veda only for the people belonging to the category - Brahmins. A food
regime that included non-vegetarian diet is permitted by the Veda for the
people belonging to the other categories to promote the requisite psychological
state of mind. However, the Veda has accorded a higher state of honour to the
people in other categories, who followed the food regime of Brahmins and at the
same time executed the moral responsibilities due to them. For instance, King
Janaka of Mithila is regarded a Rajarishi.
In spite of the diet regime; since the
activities were pruned by the Dharmasastras; and are performed for the
betterment of the society as a whole in an interdependent manner, every
category of people got elevated spiritually. Therefore, though the diet being
non-vegetarian; a sensible limit on the choice of food was effortless and
evident. Also, when a person from any of the other categories gets relieved off
one's direct responsibilities; aimed at practising the way of life that would
inculcate the Sathvik state of mind - Vegetarianism.
The life term of every person in
such a societal setup was divided into four Aashramas - Brahmacharyashramam,
Grihasthashramam, Vaanaprasthashramam and Sanyasashramam. Of the four; since
Brahmacharyashramam is practised at the hermitage of a Guru; who is a Vedic
Brahmin, strict vegetarianism becomes inevitable. In the case of a person
abiding the Sanyasashramam, a vegetarian diet that includes uncooked food -
fruits to a large extent becomes the natural way of life. Sanyasashramam
touches the peak of vegetarianism as stipulated by the Veda.
Vaanaprasthashramam focus on Vedic
activities stipulated by tradition along with spouse. However, it is devoid of
sensual pleasures, aims at the purification of mind, executed at a hermitage; and
so vegetarianism. Grihasthashramam is the only stage in a person's life time,
when one is provided a relaxation to consume non-vegetarian diet. The justification
being, the requirement of an apt psychological state of mind to execute one's
moral responsibilities for the betterment of society as a whole.
Grihasthashramam is that stage of a
person's life, when one heads a family. Protecting the members of one's family;
shouldering the direct traditional, familial and societal responsibilities; demand
a genuine need for the Rajasik or Thamasik state of mind. Hence
non-vegetarianism. Even so in the case of Brahmins, the relaxation to a
non-vegetarian diet is prohibited. However, practically, the inherent cruelty
to a living being evident in non-vegetarian diet made it less appealing to
people following the Vedic traditions.
The Veda is the source of every
scripture of Sanathana Dharma. Krishna Dwaibhayana, who detailed the Veda, consequently
called Ved Vyasa; summarised its essence thus -
"Slokaarthaena Pravakshyaami,
Yathuktham Granthakodishu;
Paropakaara Punyaaya, Paapaaya
Parapeedanam."
It infers; every scripture of
Sanathana Dharma in essence dictates that one should serve others in the good
of mankind to earn merits; or if to pile up sin, hurt others. Non-vegetarianism
is the most prominent and subtle form of individual selfishness and cruelty to
another living being. The prime objective of the Veda being streamlining the
activities of every person to accumulate merits, promoted vegetarianism in
principle. Yet still; relaxation to a sensible non-vegetarian diet was accorded
to the specific class and period based on legitimate necessity.
In the present scenario; the
distinctive nature of societal class and customs based on tradition is blurred.
Segregation of a person's life time based on functions are discarded. The responsibility
shouldered by a person in the present society have lost their traditional
belongingness to any specific class, and period of life time. People lead a
mixed up jumbled life style chosen based on convenience and sensuality. Clarity
of reasoning and sensible rationalism is victimised; evidently negating the basis
of adhering to non-vegetarianism.
Followers of the Veda are termed
Hindu. The term "Hindu" is never available in the traditional
scriptures. Hindu is a term accorded to the followers of the Veda by the rest.
However, subsequently a shrewd definition was accorded to the term,
"Hindu" -
"Himsaayaam Thooyathey; Yah Sah Hindu
Ithyapidheeyathey!"
It
describes Hindu as the one, who empathises with the suffering of another living
being. In spite of the inherent ingenuity; this description clearly evidence
the prevalence of vegetarianism among the followers of the Veda in India. It is
thus our responsibility to adhere to strict vegetarianism in a scenario that
lacks substantial ground justifying non-vegetarian diet; else the resultant
shall be the loss of a unique and profound ideal to the entire world.